Read Full-Text Decision

Mother, the infant’s guardian, sought to withdraw funds from his guardianship account arguing it was for the support and maintenance of the child. The court noted the general rule disfavored withdrawal from the corpus of an infant’s funds, absent a showing of unusual circumstances. It stated that while a child may have his own resources, a parent was obligated to support the child, including providing necessities for the infant during his minority. Mother alleged her salary was insufficient to provide for the infant’s needs, thus, the court found the purchase of clothing for the infant was an appropriate use of funds, as well as supplies in support of his education, including a computer, printer and ink supplies. Yet, it stated, given that infant was merely in seventh grade, the proposed trip for colleges was unwarranted, nor were the purchases of a television, tablet or PlayStation. Further, the court stated it could not allow depletion of the infant’s funds for the family’s use, denying withdrawal of funds for a family vacation or purchase of a car, and stated Mother failed to provide documentation supporting the need for such purchase, or how she would be able to meet the costs of insurance, maintenance or repairs on her limited income.