An appellate panel in Manhattan appears to have cleared the way for the long-postponed civil fraud trial of former American International Group executives Maurice “Hank” Greenberg and Howard Smith.
The Appellate Division, First Department in People v. Greenberg, 401720/05, rejected defense claims that the trial judge, Justice Charles Ramos, is biased. The allegation of bias was based on Ramos’ pretrial rulings and comments he made during various proceedings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
