Per Curiam
Kreisler, who is disabled, travels his neighborhood in a motorized wheelchair. He patronizes other diners but never tried to enter the Plaza Diner, because its front entrance has an eight-inch high step. Before his Oct. 10, 2010, suit alleging violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the diner possessed a small portable ramp that allowed three or four individuals in wheel chairs to eat at the diner each week. After Kreisler brought suit, J.J.N.K. Corp. bought the diner an aluminum ramp that lacked hand rails. The diner defendants’ expert priced an ADA-compliant ramp at $12,000. In addition with an interior vestibule too small to comply with the ADA, wheelchair-using patrons are unable to use the diner’s small rest-room. Affirming district court, Second Circuit concluded the court properly found that Kreisler had standing to challenge the diner’s wheelchair inaccessible entrance and the architectural barriers within the diner, and that construction of a permanent ramp could be readily achieved. Under Camarillo v. Carrols Corp., Kreisler’s testimony asserted sufficient facts showing a plausible intention to return to the diner. Further Kreisler need not have personally encountered each ADA violation within the diner to seek its removal.
