Landlord-Tenant—J-51— ‘Roberts v. Tishman Speyer’—Overcharge, Fraud and Abatement Claims Rejected—Tenant Was Undercharged Rather Than Overcharged—”Complex Legal Environment Created by the Changing Law” Affected This Case—Warranty of Habitability
A landlord commenced a summary nonpayment proceeding seeking to recover rent and late fees. The tenant interposed “affirmative defenses of breach of the warranty of habitability,” “rent overcharge and fraud and counter-claims for treble damages and harassment.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
