Per Curiam
Rodriguez pleaded guilty to reentering the United States illegally after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony in violation of 8 USC §§1326(a) and 1326(b). District court sentenced Rodriguez to 57 months’ imprisonment, running consecutively to an undischarged term of imprisonment that Rodriguez was serving in connection with drug convictions in Virginia. Affirming district court, Second Circuit rejected Rodriguez’s argument that district court’s refusal to impose a concurrent or partially concurrent sentence rendered his 57-month U.S. Sentencing Guidelines sentence substantively unreasonable. District court imposed Rodriguez’s 57-month sentence to run consecutively to his existing sentence after considering his history, characteristics, and the goals of sentencing, most notably deterrence. Those are permissible factors for a district court to consider under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines §5G1.3(c), which permits the consideration of factors listed under 18 USC §3553(a). Thus, district court acted within its discretion in imposing the sentence to run consecutively to the state sentence.
