Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in United States v. Booker, the United States Sentencing Guidelines play a significant role in the sentences imposed on defendants convicted of federal crimes. While the "influence of the guidelines…has diminished in fraud cases,"1 district judges are required to begin the sentencing process by properly determining the applicable guidelines range,2 and a recent report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission found that the majority of sentences are still within guidelines range.3
In tax cases, the "advisory" guidelines are predicated on an estimate of the "tax loss" associated with the defendant’s conduct. The rationale for this reliance on tax loss is the assumption that "a greater tax loss is obviously more harmful to the treasury and more serious than a smaller one with otherwise similar characteristics."4 The guidelines provide that, in the case of individuals, "tax loss" is presumed to be 28 percent of the underreported gross income or improperly claimed deductions, exemptions, or credits, "unless a more accurate determination of tax loss can be made."5 This begs the question of how a sentencing court goes about making a "more accurate determination of tax loss" in a given case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
