The U.S. solicitor general has filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court opposing review of gag orders barring a lawyer from disclosing sealed records related to a government informant. Frederick Oberlander of Long Island, who attached sealed records to a civil racketeering lawsuit he filed three years ago in the Southern District, claims he has a First Amendment right to divulge information about Felix Sater. Sater’s 1998 securities fraud conviction was sealed when he agreed to assist investigators in matters apparently involving national security.

Oberlander is representing the plaintiffs in Kriss v. Bay Rock Group, 10-cv-3959, who claim they were duped into investing with Sater, a convicted felon, because the government sealed his record as part of the 1998 cooperation agreement. But after attaching Sater’s cooperation agreement and probation report to the complaint, Oberlander was hit with a series of gag orders. Oberlander and his attorney, Richard Lerner, are also under investigation for criminal and civil contempt.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]