Occupants of a so-called “sober house” sufficiently argued they were entitled to rent-regulation protections, a Brooklyn appeals court ruled in reinstating a putative class action and ordering it to be heard by a different judge.

In an unsigned opinion, an Appellate Division, Second Department, panel reversed Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Bernadette Bayne’s (See Profile) dismissal in 2011 of DiGiorgio v. 1109-1113 Manhattan Ave. Partners, 2011-08610, and ordered it to be heard by another judge. The panel pointed to “repeated statements made by the Supreme Court during oral argument, which exhibited bias against the plaintiffs.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]