QUOIZEL, INC., Plaintiff-resap, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellantres
7761. QUOIZEL, INC., Plaintiff-resap, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellantres — Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale (Cheryl F. Korman of counsel), for appellant-res — Wilkofsky, Friedman, Karel & Cummins, New York (Harry A. Cummins of counsel), for res-res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered November 14, 2011, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on its complaint seeking the difference between the amount defendant paid it on its property damage claim, i.e., the cost of replacement, and the selling price of the damaged property, affirmed, without costs.
|January 22, 2013
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
This premium content is locked for New York Law Journal subscribers only.
Subscribe now to enjoy unlimited access to New York Law Journal content,
5 free articles* across the ALM Network every 30 days,
Exclusive access to other free ALM publications
And exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications.
*May exclude premium content Already have an account? Sign In Now
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org to learn more.
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.