Matter of Abdullah v Selsky

Decided and Entered: November 15, 2007
501855
________________________________
In the Matter of ELIJAH ABDULLAH, Petitioner,
v
DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs,
et al., .....

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: November 15, 2007 501855 ________________________________ In the Matter of ELIJAH ABDULLAH, Petitioner, v DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents. ___________________________ Calendar Date: September 26, 2007 Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ. __________ Elijah Abdullah, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents. __________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possessing a weapon and damaging state property. After that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it and conducted the search of petitioner’s cell constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Brown v Goord, 24 AD3d 840, 840 [2005]; Matter of Encarnacion v Goord, 19 AD3d 906, 907 [2005]). Petitioner’s assertion that the weapon had been planted in his cell by another inmate created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Ameen v Selsky, 25 AD3d 1059, 1059 [2006]). We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to call witnesses and present other evidence, and find them to be unpersuasive. Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Matter of Abdullah v Selsky

Decided and Entered: November 15, 2007 501855 ________________________________ In the Matter of ELIJAH ABDULLAH, Petitioner, v DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., .....

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Decided and Entered: November 15, 2007
501855
________________________________
In the Matter of ELIJAH ABDULLAH, Petitioner,
v
DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs,
et al., .....