A federal judge has green-lighted key claims by Bank of America shareholders in a securities class action and a companion derivative suit challenging the bank’s disclosures in advance of its merger with Merrill Lynch.

Southern District Judge P. Kevin Castel ruled in In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative and ERISA Litigation, 09 MD 2058, that the securities class action complaint adequately pleads that Bank of America did not make sufficient disclosures about the existence of a controversial $5.8 billion bonus pool to be used to pay Merrill employees before the merger.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]