A recent report that names 14 New York City judges who the authors claim are more likely than their peers to order pretrial detention in criminal matters is drawing backlash from judges’ groups who characterize it as an attempt to intimidate the judiciary.

On Thursday, a coalition of 12 judges’ groups issued a letter alleging that the report—titled “Cost of Discretion: Judicial Decision-Making, Pretrial Detention and Public Safety in New York City”—was issued to “undermine judicial independence.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]