ChatGPT and other generative AI applications reflect a recurring challenge for lawyers: deciding whether, when and how to adopt new technologies. Although it might be tempting to base these decisions on anecdotal reports about the new technology’s purported benefits, such reports may not address fully (or at all) the technology’s limitations or risks.
As the recent sanctions decision in Mata v. Avianca illustrates, adopting a new technology without a clear understanding of what it can and cannot do can have significant negative consequences.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
