A party can withhold his signature and remain unbound by a settlement agreement, even when his attorney had actual authority to approve material terms of the settlement and approved a “final version” of the settlement draft. That was the court’s conclusion in a recent case in the Southern District of New York.

In Fernandez v. HR Parking, 16-cv-2762, the court denied a motion to enforce a written settlement agreement that attorneys on both sides had approved, after two of the five plaintiffs refused to sign. Using the four-factor test from Winston v. Mediafare Ent., 777 F.2d 78, 80 (2d Cir. 1985), the court concluded that the parties had communicated an intent not to be bound until a written agreement had been fully executed.

Background

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]