Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Prince Photo Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of Prince courtesy of the court filings, left, Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince,” courtesy of Wikicommons, right.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said Friday that Andy Warhol did not make “fair use” of a photographer’s copyrighted image of the iconic musician Prince, in a ruling that fine-tuned the court’s precedent relating to transformative works and cautioned trial judges to refrain from the role of art critic.

The ruling, from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court, reversed a trial court decision in finding that Warhol’s famous series of 16 silkscreen works had infringed Lynn Goldsmith’s copyright for her 1981 photograph portraying Prince in black and white.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Tom McParland

Tom McParland of New York Law Journal can be contacted at [email protected] Follow him on Twitter @TMcParlandALM.

More from this author

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.