X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Elliott Scheinberg Elliott Scheinberg

Part II  of this column continues the appellate rebuke of judges who deliberately frustrate the statutory right of aggrieved parties to take an appeal by refusing to sign their names to orders they have issued. In Charalabidis v. Elnagar, 188 A.D.3d 44 (2d Dept. 2020), a scholarly exegesis written by Justice Mark Dillon, the Second Department not only applied the case law discussed in Part I of this column, but also added depth to the analysis by way of an extensive review of CPLR 2219.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 

New York Motion Practice Handbook and FormsBook

This book includes 80+ forms and sample documents on CD and identifies the statutory provisions governing various types of motions and key decisions that interpret them...

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.