Lots of media and academic theories are circulating about what’s going on at the just-completed term of the Supreme Court, under the lengthening leadership tenure of Chief Justice John Roberts. Many interpretations take the standard route of a horizontal scan across a spectrum of well-worn labels. There are the inevitable surprises, as jurists are not as predictable as some would like and they often privately rebel against pigeonholing.

The pretentious labeling and would-be prophetic slotting that goes on often mislead by proffering binary choices of liberal-conservative or right-center-left coalitions and swings of voting patterns. An alternative look from a vertical angle may provide a clearer and more reliable insight by examining Chief Justice Roberts’ institutional leadership role—not his individual votes in separate or collated appeals.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]