Changes to New Laws on Cash Bail Possible, Cuomo Says, as Legislature Begins New Session
A top Democrat in the state Senate said Monday that lawmakers should take a wait-and-see approach before they consider any amendments to the new laws.
January 06, 2020 at 05:39 PM
5 minute read
Democrats shouldn't dismiss the idea that New York's new laws limiting the use of cash bail may need changes as the state Legislature returns to Albany this week, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday.
A top Democrat in the state Senate, meanwhile, said Monday that lawmakers should take a wait-and-see approach before they consider any amendments to the new laws.
The conflict comes just days after the new laws on cash bail took effect. They were implemented at the start of the year, but have been the subject of criticism from Republicans since they were approved last March.
Cuomo, speaking at an event in Manhattan, said he supported the intent of the new laws, but that tweaks may be needed.
"There's no doubt this is still a work in progress and there are other changes that have to be made," Cuomo said. "Again, it's literally three or four days, the Legislature comes back next year, and we're going to work on it because there are consequences that we have to adjust for."
Democrats who lead both chambers of the state Legislature have said in recent months that a majority of lawmakers don't support amending the newly enacted laws. There have been one-off proposals, but each has failed to become law.
The new laws largely eliminated the option of cash bail for most low-level and nonviolent charges, meaning that individuals accused of those crimes are now allowed to remain out of jail ahead of trial.
In the months leading up to the implementation of the new reforms, the law enforcement community voiced concerns over a series of charges that would no longer be bail-eligible, like third-degree assault as a hate crime and the criminal sale of a controlled substance.
Those concerns were echoed by Republicans, who have called for the reforms to either be delayed or amended so that judges can consider additional factors when deciding whether someone should be released or held before trial.
That's typically referred to as a defendant's so-called "dangerousness," or perceived threat to public safety. It's never been used in New York to determine pretrial incarceration, but prosecutors have called for that to change with the new limits on cash bail.
They've argued that, if judges can no longer assign bail for certain charges, they should be allowed to look at a defendant's background or criminal history to decide if they could pose a threat to public safety upon release.
Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, introduced legislation Monday to do just that.
Paulin said in a statement Monday that a recent spate of anti-Semitic incidents in New York should prompt lawmakers to give judges more discretion to decide if someone should be allowed to remain free after they've been charged with such a crime.
"Bail reform needed to happen in the interest of justice and equal treatment of accused individuals, but we must balance those objectives against the safety and security of our residents," Paulin said. "During this time of widespread and increased attacks against the Jewish community, we must do all we can to make all New Yorkers feel safe and protected."
Paulin cited a specific incident in Brooklyn, in late December, when a woman was released without bail after she allegedly attacked three Jewish women while shouting anti-Semitic slurs.
That woman, Tiffany Harris, was accused of a similar assault the next day and again released without bail. After a third arrest, Harris was admitted for a psychiatric evaluation. Paulin said judges should have more discretion to detain someone in future cases.
A similar measure was previously announced by Sen. James Tedisco, R-Schenectady, and Assemblyman Angelo Santabarbara, D-Schenectady.
Other Democrats have said the new laws on cash bail should be given a chance to work before lawmakers consider imposing any major changes to the statute.
Sen. Michael Gianaris, a Democrat from Queens and the deputy majority leader of the Senate, said Monday that he wants to collect more data on the impact of the new laws before he considers supporting an amendment.
"This law has been in place for six days," Gianaris said. "So, for someone to decide in six days that this is already not working is not rendering an opinion based on information and data, which is how we try to make our decisions."
But the door isn't closed on possible changes, Gianaris said. While he supports the laws as enacted, he said Democrats will continue to evaluate if there's any room for amendments to the statute after they return to Albany this week for the legislative session.
"The job of the Legislature is to improve the laws. We believe we've done that with these reforms," Gianaris said. "There's some conversation about continued changes that may be necessary. We'll certainly look at things as they come up and discussions will continue."
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Decision of the Day: De Blasio Must Sit for Deposition in Suit Over City Program to Transfer Foreclosed Properties
The Legislature Has Enacted Landmark Criminal Justice Reforms. Now It Should Take Steps to Improve the System
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250