X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Jerry H. Goldfeder and Myrna Pérez Jerry H. Goldfeder and Myrna Pérez

The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court allowing partisan gerrymanders (Rucho v. Common Cause, 139 S.Ct. 2484 (2019)) and the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit holding that members of the electoral college are free to vote their conscience (Baca v. Colorado, — F.3d.— (10th Cir. Aug. 20, 2019)) will each have far-reaching consequences for our elections—and each will be written about in due course. Today, we address several of the latest rulings by New York courts concerning limitations on the public’s involvement in elections; the apparent lack of consequences for forgers in ballot access cases; and the doctrine of “unintentional fraud.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.