Life Insurance Funder's $6M Arent Fox Malpractice Suit Heads to Trial
A federal judge said the evidence didn't clearly favor either side in a life insurance premium finance company's malpractice suit against Arent Fox.
April 03, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
A $6 million legal malpractice case brought by a life insurance policy investor against Arent Fox and one of its partners is headed to trial after a federal judge mostly rejected efforts by both sides to clarify whether the firm had made an error.
Windsor Securities, which lent money to several trusts so they could take out life insurance policies for elderly people that would serve as collateral for the loans, said the firm and its partner, Julius Rousseau, gave bad advice that resulted in its efforts to collect under the policies being disputed. Windsor ended up switching lawyers and inking settlements, but said Arent Fox and its lawyer are to blame for its losses.
Both sides sought summary judgment, but U.S. District Judge George Daniels of the Southern District of New York ruled on March 27 that neither side's evidence was enough to prevail on the main issue before him. He granted Arent Fox a win on claims worth $38,000, but the judge wrote that premium-finance and legal experts disagreed on key points related to negligence and whether Arent Fox and its lawyer were the proximate cause of Windsor's losses.
Two of Windsor's claims—for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty—were cut from the suit completely, with the judge saying they were duplicative of the malpractice claim.
According to Windsor, Rousseau told the company that once the funds it loaned to the trusts came due, it simply needed to file a change-of-ownership form with the life insurance companies for it to get its hands on the policies. That legal theory was tested, however, when John Bitter, one of the insureds, died, and the trustee that held his policy disputed Windsor's entitlement to the death benefits.
The policy disputes turned on the agreements between Windsor and the trusts and how section 9620 of the California Commercial Code bore on the transfer of the insurance policies. In the Bitter case, an arbitration panel faulted Windsor for not invoking the default sales right in its agreements with the trust, and the company says Rousseau was negligent to have missed it.
Alan Frank of Alan L. Frank Law Associates, who represents Windsor, said in an email that “over $6 million” in damages was still on the table.
Peter Wang, a partner at Foley & Lardner who represents the defendants, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readGEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
4 minute readHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 111 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
- 2In-House Moves of Month: Discover Fills Awkward CLO Opening, Allegion GC Lasts Just 3 Months
- 3Delaware Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 4'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
- 52 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250