NY Bar Associations Look to Sell, Rent Their Buildings as Membership Declines or Stagnates
Bar associations in New York and around the country are transforming rapidly in reaction to demographic trends: a millennial generation that prefers virtual communities, law firms that don't want to provide financial support and lawyers who are questioning the value of belonging.
September 04, 2018 at 12:25 PM
4 minute read
The New York County Lawyers Association has hired an investment team to sell its majestic 87-year-old headquarters on Vesey Street.
The New York State Bar Association is marketing its stately building between the Capitol and Court of Appeals as an events venue.
The Brooklyn Bar Association is looking to pump much-needed capital into its coffers by taking out a mortgage or a line of credit or having its leaders donate $2,500 each.
The American Bar Association is slashing dues to attract members in the face of a loss of 56,000 of them in the last decade.
“There's always been pressure to recruit and retain members but it's clear that the pressure has never been as great as it is today,” said New York State Bar Association president Michael Miller. “Whether it's a Kiwanis club or a professional organization like bar associations or the AMA, there has been a marked decline in how people associate.”
Bar associations in New York and around the country are transforming rapidly in reaction to demographic trends: a millennial generation that prefers virtual communities, law firms that don't want to provide financial support and lawyers who are questioning the value of belonging.
For its part, the NYCLA has hired a team from CBRE to market and sell its building but its executive director, Sophia Gianacoplos, says the association is still in the fact-finding stage.
“It would have to be a great deal. We would have to have a great place to go to,” she said as she gave a tour of the four-story Vesey Street building.
The building, a New York City landmark, is the work of Cass Gilbert, the architect who designed the U.S. Supreme Court. The walls are so thick, however, that connecting to Wi-Fi in every nook and cranny is a challenge and the facility seriously needs more widescreen televisions.
There was a time not so long ago when new lawyers flooded the historic building a few times a year to attend orientation for the First Department. While the new lawyers were often impressed with the building's beauty, almost all of those who joined the association said in a survey that it would be fine to sell it, said Toni Valente, director of marketing and membership.
The state bar is not considering selling its headquarters but it's being marketed prominently on the association's website as an events venue, and Miller wants to hold more of the association's programming there.
The state bar did experience a decline in membership from 74,075 in 2007 to 69,367 in 2017 but has restructured its staff to save money and be more efficient. “We have had to make some hard decisions because there are a lot of sacred cows that have developed over the years,” he said.
The president of the Brooklyn Bar Association wouldn't talk publicly about its finances but a source close to its operation said it was in financial difficulty.
“It needs to raise money and is considering a number of options: taking a mortgage on the building; obtaining a line of credit; raising money by asking the leaders of the group to donate $2,500 each. No decision can be made until the trustees meet in September to vote on a plan,” the source said.
Bret Parker, executive director of the New York City Bar Association, said the city bar's membership is flat. In response, the association is offering free CLEs and has hired a caterer to make its 44th Street building more attractive as a weekend destination.
“We're very aware that the legal profession demographics have shifted,” he said. “There was a period of time when many lawyers thought it was just part of being a lawyer and being in the profession that you would join the New York City bar association. Now we're expected to make a business case.”
But selling the building, which has many activities every day and evening, is not something the New York City bar wants to do, he said.
“It's a physical place for people to come together in a world where people don't do that so often,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute readUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-57
- 2Milbank Leads Bonus Race, Rolling Out Year-End Pay News
- 3Teen Overseas Boarding Schools Face Wave of Miami Federal Lawsuits
- 4Decision of the Day: While Judge Was 'Moved' by Immigrant Couple's Efforts to Cast Votes in 2024 Election, Late Registration Denied
- 5California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250