A year has passed since the SEC issued its groundbreaking DAO Report, in which the SEC, for the first time, unambiguously asserted its regulatory authority over initial coin offerings (“ICOs”)—in which investors typically invest in a blockchain-based enterprise in exchange for digital tokens—and ICO-issued digital tokens.  

In doing so, the SEC classified ICO tokens as securities subject to existing securities laws. Since the SEC issued the DAO report, it has aggressively stepped up its public warnings against, and regulation of, these novel fundraising vehicles. ICO proponents have responded in varying ways, whether by exploring creative products that they believe do not trigger SEC regulation, seeking SEC approval or challenging the SEC’s position in court.  Now, in United States v. Zaslavskiy, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York will decide the first direct challenge to the SEC’s classification of ICOs as securities offerings subject to SEC regulation.

The SEC’s Foray into Cryptocurrency Regulation

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]