Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Since well before the Sedona Conference published its Cooperation Proclamation, it was well-known that cooperation between requesting and responding parties was crucial to an efficient and cost effective discovery process. Where parties cooperate, discovery disputes are limited, narrowed and, sometimes, even eliminated. Where parties do not cooperate, there are more disputes, they are uglier, and the costs escalate. This ideal of cooperation has been incorporated into the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 1 requires the parties to construe, administer and employ the rules “to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination” of an action. The Advisory Committee Note to Rule 1, noting that “most lawyers and parties cooperate to achieve these ends,” goes on to state that “[e]ffective advocacy is consistent with—and indeed depends upon—cooperative and proportional use of procedure.” (emphasis supplied). The question then is not whether cooperation is good, but rather how parties and the court can encourage and enable cooperation, especially where the parties and counsel are aggressively antagonistic.

The most important factor in generating cooperation in discovery is building trust between opposing counsel. Without trust that the opposing counsel will act in good faith, reasonably and fairly, counsel will be glacially slow to reach agreements, which will be drawn narrowly and excruciatingly documented. Without trust, counsel will be afraid to extend any courtesy, fearing (or expecting) that it will not be reciprocated. Without trust, counsel fear that any slip or any concession in discovery will be converted into a weapon to be used to undermine a client’s substantive case and leverage settlement or dismissal.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com


New York Motion Practice Handbook and FormsBook

New York Motion Practice Handbook Formsidentifies the statutory provisions governing various types of motions and the key decisions that interpret them. The book address...

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.