U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts miffed some legal educators in 2011 when he said at a judicial conference that law review articles are largely about arcane topics that are of no use to practitioners and judges.

It turns out that he’s not the only one who sees some real problems with the law review system, where law student editors are tasked with selecting and editing lengthy and extensively footnoted research papers written primarily by law professors.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]