Arizona's attorney general on Monday told the U.S. Supreme Court that states could demand more proof of citizenship than federal law does to determine who is eligible to vote.
March 20, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Arizona’s attorney general on Monday told the U.S. Supreme Court that states could demand more proof of citizenship than federal law does to determine who is eligible to vote.
The justices heard arguments in the closely watched case of Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona in which Arizona Attorney General Thomas Horne defended the state’s so-called Proposition 200 from claims that it conflicts with the National Voter Registration Act.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
