Four months after the Supreme Court decided Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew, a Federal Circuit judge has suggested that the decision didn't go far enough.
October 13, 2021 at 07:20 PM
4 minute read
It’s been four months since the U.S. Supreme Court decided a constitutional challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
Could it already be time for yet another?
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
Federal Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk, left, and Pauline Newman, right. Photos: Tony Mauro/Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
