The controversy brings up questions about the court's vetting process for judicial clerks. But Chief Judge William Pryor is not answering them.
October 11, 2021 at 01:14 PM
3 minute read
Reporter
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Call it #ClerkGate.
The phones have been lighting up at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit over a controversy about racist statements attributed to a member of the next crop of Chief Judge William Pryor’s law clerks.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
Judge William Pryor Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention in Washington, on November 14, 2019. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
