X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Clarence Thomas Justice Clarence Thomas/photo by Diego Radzinschi

In Tuesday’s historic arguments over President Donald Trump’s fight against subpoenas for his financial records, the U.S. Supreme Court justices struggled to find a balance between their worries about potential harassment of presidents and interference with their duties and concerns over how a ruling for the White House could elevate presidents above the law and impede legitimate oversight and investigations.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Marcia Coyle

Marcia Coyle, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. Contact her at mcoyle@alm.com. On Twitter: @MarciaCoyle

More from this author

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.