Are We on the Cusp of Crippling the CFPB?
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse argues that an anti-regulatory money machine is to blame.
March 03, 2020 at 02:41 PM
6 minute read
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau headquarters in Washington, D.C. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
On Tuesday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the culmination of Wall Street's sustained assault on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Killing off the CFPB would be a blow to the countless Americans this agency protects. But the powerful forces attacking the CFPB have even greater aspirations. They desire to cripple Congress' ability to establish independent agencies to safeguard Americans' health, safety and economic welfare.
The CFPB has been a success, winning back over $12 billion for defrauded consumers since 2011. Other independent agencies—the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve—are similarly ingrained in our democratic system. Americans expect them to regulate the marketplace impartially, expertly, and based on evidence and facts. Their constitutional legitimacy has long been beyond question. That is, until now.
After failing to make the political case against agencies like the CFPB, powerful corporate forces have turned their losing political case into a rigged constitutional one. They've moved fringe legal theories into mainstream conservative legal thought, and they've deployed an army of attorneys, academics and judges to apply those theories to their advantage. This was no small effort. As Vox's Ian Millhiser writes, "Seila Law could be the culmination of a conservative crusade that began more than three decades ago."
As my colleagues and I document in our amicus brief to the Supreme Court, this crusade has been led by the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. The Federalist Society is funded by tens of millions of billionaire and corporate dollars, from donors like the Kochs and Mercers who would like nothing better than to hobble their regulators. We'd know more, but the Federalist Society keeps its donors secret. The group also has a key role in selecting agreeable federal judges. (Sidebar: Secretly funded private organizations helping to select judges—what could possibly go wrong?)
Former White House Counsel Don McGahn said in a moment of candor that "there is a coherent plan here where actually the judicial selection and the deregulatory effort are really the flip side of the same coin." Translation: we'll nix regulations our big donors hate by installing judges hand-picked to kill regulations. So it's no surprise that fully 85% of Trump's nominees to the powerful, policy-making appellate courts have claimed Federalist Society membership. And, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has turned the Senate into a confirmation conveyor belt to stack federal courts with often unqualified, pro-corporate judges.
It starts at the top. Obsessive hostility to government regulations was a feature of the candidacies of Supreme Court nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. During Gorsuch's confirmation process, Federalist Society boosters championed his nomination as "of profound importance given the all-encompassing reach of today's administrative state," and heralded his denunciation of long-standing precedent counseling judges to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Likewise, the Trump administration touted Kavanaugh as a judge who "protects American businesses from illegal job-killing regulation," boasting that he "has overruled federal agency action 75 times." In a 2017 case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh even auditioned his belief that the CFPB's independent structure is unconstitutional.
The Federalist Society's dark money network is hard at work lobbying the Supreme Court through amicus briefs. According to the Center for Media and Democracy, the Federalist Society received at least $33 million from 16 right-wing foundations since 2014. Those same 16 foundations donated nearly $69 million to a network of 11 nominally different groups, all of which filed amicus briefs in Seila Law urging the high court to kill the CFPB. None of this funding was disclosed to the court, to the parties, or to the public.
The dark-money web now entangling the court first helps select justices through the Federalist Society; then helps confirm the justices through the Judicial Crisis Network; then helps present cases to the justices through groups like the Pacific Legal Foundation; and then provides the justices a chorus of approval through this network of amici. Again, what could possibly go wrong?
Now, the donors may be on the cusp of winning their decades-long crusade.
Americans could lose the protection provided by independent, expert agencies like the CFPB. The agency has helped tens of millions of American consumers, serving as a bulwark against rapacious banks, payday lenders, and student loan servicers.
Americans would be shocked to know that the very safeguards Congress erected to protect the CFPB from forces of influence are being used by those same forces of influence as arguments to eliminate the agency. They would be shocked to learn that millions of dollars of corporate interest money have gone into shaping the judiciary to achieve this result. Yet here we are. Our Supreme Court is poised to do for industry what industry could not do through the political process—based on legal theories grown in the industry-funded Federalist Society hothouse.
Chief Justice John Roberts recently warned that "justice is not inevitable," and reflected on "our duty to judge without fear or favor, deciding each matter with humility, integrity, and dispatch," so as to best "maintain the public's trust that we are faithfully discharging our solemn obligation to equal justice under law." He and his colleagues could well reflect on whether the solemn obligation of discharging equal justice under law can be achieved with so many millions in dark money enmiring the court. I submit it cannot.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse represents Rhode Island in the U.S. Senate. A former Rhode Island attorney general and U.S. attorney, Whitehouse serves on the Senate Judiciary, Budget, Finance, and Environment and Public Works committees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
5 minute read
Justice 'Weaponization Working Group' Will Examine Officials Who Investigated Trump, US AG Bondi Says

Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer

Judge Accuses Trump of Constitutional End Run, Blocks Citizenship Order
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250