Larry Wallace, Former Deputy Solicitor General and Courageous Civil Servant, Dies at 88
Harvard Law School professor Richard Lazarus called Larry Wallace's legendary footnote in a U.S. Supreme Court case "an act of extraordinary personal courage and professional integrity."
February 23, 2020 at 01:43 PM
6 minute read
Former deputy U.S. Solicitor General Lawrence Wallace, who died February 13 at age 88, is being remembered as a fearless civil servant who, like the Justice Department lawyers who recently resigned from the Roger Stone case, resisted pressure from higher-level officials.
Wallace retired from the solicitor's office in 2003 after arguing 157 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, a 20th century record.
In 1982, he included a memorable footnote in a brief signaling that he would not support the Reagan administration's position in Bob Jones University v. United States. At issue was the Internal Revenue Service policy that denied tax-exempt status to institutions that discriminated by race. The Reagan White House wanted to oppose that policy in the government's brief.
When Solicitor General Rex Lee recused, the task of signing the brief fell to Wallace. Wallace did so, but insisted on adding the footnote, which angered Reagan administration officials. The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the policy.
The late Erwin Griswold, who served as the U.S. solicitor general from 1967 to 1973, told The Washington Post in 1982 that Wallace's action was "an attempt to preserve the credibility of the office."
Wallace remained in the office, but he was relieved of handling civil rights cases for the government, and a new position of a politically appointed deputy solicitor general was created.
Harvard Law School professor Richard Lazarus on Saturday called Wallace's legendary footnote "an act of extraordinary personal courage and professional integrity." Lazarus continued: "The more recent action of the career Justice Department attorneys in resigning from the Stone prosecution to make clear their disagreement with orders from the Attorney General to withdraw their sentencing recommendation is strikingly reminiscent of Wallace's action."
Others who worked with Wallace praised him as a mentor of dozens of government lawyers during his 35-year career in the solicitor general's office.
"Larry was a dear soul, a wonderful colleague, and a mentor to many, many government lawyers," said Seth Waxman, former solicitor general and co-chair of the appellate and Supreme Court litigation practice at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. "His professional life was entirely dedicated to the interests of the United States and to the traditions and excellence of the office of the solicitor general. Larry elevated the spirits and sights of those of us who had the privilege to work with him."
Michael Dreeben, a longtime former deputy solicitor general who is now a partner at O'Melveny & Myers, remembered his job interview with Wallace.
"He served me coffee in a china cup, reminisced about the justices and gently pointed out that my writing sample had cited a Supreme Court plurality opinion as if it were the opinion of the court—all to let me know that the office had standards to live up to," Dreeben said. "He constantly reminded new attorneys that they had joined an institution with traditions to be upheld and standards to meet. His devotion to the office made him the living embodiment of its values: candor, accuracy and integrity."
As familiar as he was with the unwritten rules and etiquette of Supreme Court arguments, Wallace did not always acquiesce to the rapid-fire questioning of the justices.
Lawyers arguing before the court are schooled to drop everything and immediately respond to a justice's question, but Wallace sometimes bared his impatience and ignored that rule in favor of getting his own points across. He also had a somewhat haughty manner of speaking that did not always please the justices. In a post-retirement interview in 2003 with this reporter, Wallace said, "It's very hard to build anything with your argument when you are asked a question before you establish where you want to go."
Wallace also shrugged off the enduring practice of undergoing multiple moot courts before argument. He did not want to peak prematurely. "It's an idiosyncrasy of mine," he said in the 2003 interview. "Most advocates do benefit from them." Instead, he would take long walks in his Chevy Chase, Maryland, neighborhood to ponder the tough questions in the case: "You need to be very clear about how to formulate your key concepts. You can't be fumbling for words up there."
Wallace recounted a conversation with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. He said that a Justice Department official once told him, "The trouble with you is that you think you work for the Supreme Court, not the administration." Wallace said O'Connor looked at him and said, "Well, you just go right on thinking that way."
And Wallace did just that. "Of course, you advocate the government's position," he said. "But there are times when it is necessary to bring things to the attention of the court, whether it helps your case or not. And that is what I did."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDapper Labs $4M Settlement, $1.3M in Attorney Fees Reveal NFT Settlement Trend
4 minute read'Major Change'? 6th Circuit Steps Into Fight Over NLRB's Expanded Money Remedies
Split 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute readThe FTC's Rebecca Slaughter Wants Fair Competition, and a Good Night's Sleep
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250