In an attempt to forestall the House’s impeachment proceedings, President Donald Trump has released summaries of calls with the Ukrainian president that he claims exonerate him. The main defense of Trump and his supporters continues to be that there was no quid pro quo: he did not expressly condition Ukraine’s continued receipt of American foreign aid to defend against Russian aggression on an agreement by its president to criminally investigate the Bidens.

While the impeachment proceedings aim to determine whether or not such a threat was indeed made—and presumably would constitute grounds for charging an abuse of powers by Trump—it is worth noting that such a defense is becoming alarmingly commonplace. It echoes the president’s main rejoinder to the Robert Mueller investigation regarding Russian interference with the 2016 elections: that although he may have sent strong signals welcoming such meddling, there was never any collusion with respect to it. In other words, Trump and his campaign never expressly agreed to Russian efforts to help him get elected, particularly in exchange for any favorable treatment Russia would receive if he won.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]