X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Andrea Mazingo, left, and Nilab Rahyar Tolton Andrea Mazingo, left, and Nilab Rahyar Tolton, the two original named plaintiffs seeking to represent a class of women suing Jones Day for “systematic discrimination.” Courtesy photo

In Jones Day’s most comprehensive response yet to a $200 million proposed gender discrimination class action, the firm flatly rejected the idea that its associates in all geographical markets were entitled to be paid along the “Cravath Scale” and highlighted what it described as the professional failings of several women levying accusations against the firm.

This premium content is locked for
National Law Journal subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Dan Packel

Dan Packel covers law firms' global strategy and economics. Based in Philadelphia, he writes a weekly briefing for Law.com, "The Law Firm Disrupted," exploring change and innovation in the legal services market. Contact him at dpackel@alm.com. On Twitter at @packeld

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.