Judge Timothy Dyk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Photo by Diego Radzinschi/ALM
Fifteen states had argued that they and their public universities shouldn't have to expose their patents to validity review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
June 14, 2019 at 08:48 PM
1 minute read
States, like Native American tribes, are not immune from having their patents reviewed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
So ruled the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Friday, resolving a dispute that pitted the University of Minnesota against four large technology companies.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
