By Greg Land | April 23, 2019
New filings indicate two FCRA cases are being combined in Georgia in preparation for a settlement.
By Jenna Greene | April 2, 2019
As a pair of wins by Morgan Lewis and Latham show, securities class action plaintiffs can only stretch the event-based theories so far.
By Amanda Bronstad | January 31, 2019
The DOJ filed notices Jan. 25 in class actions against two railroad equipment suppliers and cases involving Arby's, Carl's Jr. and Auntie Anne's franchises.
By Ross Todd | January 31, 2019
An en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit blocked a San Francisco city ordinance that would have required health warnings on advertisements for sodas and other sugar-sweetened drinks.
By Jenna Greene | January 14, 2019
Pro se litigants usually fare terribly in court. So how did a young immigrant from Guinea who was fired from his job at Whole Foods defeat a motion for summary judgment by employment law experts from Greenberg Traurig?
By Jenna Greene | December 20, 2018
The trio of litigators successfully defended ramen noodle companies from Korea that were hit with a $500 million class action for price fixing.
By John Council | December 18, 2018
After a five-week trial, a federal jury in San Francisco issued a defense verdict in a $500 million antitrust class action filed against two South Korean companies accused of conspiring to fix the price of ramen noodles in the United States.
By Scott Graham | November 21, 2018
A Los Angeles jury finds infringement and awards $5 million in punitives, but zero actual damages. Now a big fight looms over an injunction to stop Integrated Supply Network from infringing.
By Jason Grant | November 21, 2018
In 2012, the Palm's prized intellectual property—its trademarks, service marks and design elements, including its robust menu and caricature-filled walls—became the fighting ground for a legal dispute between long-connected families. Now, an important state Supreme Court bench trial decision has settled the dispute, at least for the time being.
By Ross Todd | November 5, 2018
A federal judge in San Jose mostly turned back a request from Plano, Texas-based Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc. to toss the California class action finding consumers could plausibly claim they expected Canada Dry to contain ginger root rather than a ginger derivative.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS