By Angela Morris | June 10, 2019
“This violation has caused three months of delay in a case that has already been pending for three years and forced the parties to revisit issues that should have been resolved two years ago," the court wrote.
By Jenna Greene | May 16, 2019
'The court finds that the defendants have shown good cause justifying a protective order staying discovery during the pendency of their motion to dismiss,' a state court judge Connecticut found.
By Max Mitchell | May 7, 2019
Philadelphia Judge Gary Glazer ruled last week that counterclaims raised by Nabil Kassem and NMK Resources needed to be dismissed on a judgment of non pros because the parties raising the countersuit repeatedly violated the court's discovery orders by failing to timely and fully respond to the requests.
By Jenna Greene | May 7, 2019
A federal judge in the Eastern District of New York has recommended that Abbott's motion for sanctions be granted, and that default judgment be entered against H&H.for "a calculated pattern of pervasive misconduct."
By Amanda Bronstad | April 15, 2019
In a motion filed this month, Apple alleged there had been a 'blatant and very serious violation' of a protective order and said principals in Cotchett Pitre should be blocked from viewing confidential documents
By Jenna Greene | March 28, 2019
I love a good sanctions smack-down. So what might a litigator as renowned as David Boies get his hand slapped for? The answer: Not much.
By Ellis Kim | March 25, 2019
The efforts to wrest Mueller's findings into public view could play out on three separate legal tracks.
By Jonathan Ringel | March 18, 2019
"If I could mandate one change in the practice of law, it would be to ban the use of e-mail communication between civil practitioners."
By Ross Todd | March 16, 2019
A California state court judge found that a litigation opponent of the social media giant had "utilized the services of counsel to aid in committing a crime or fraud" when handing over confidential documents to British Parliament and journalists.
By Ross Todd | February 14, 2019
Defense firms and companies claim that the requirement to meet and confer over the identity of corporate representives for 30(b)(6) depositions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS