L-R:Greg Varallo and Jeroen van Kwawegen of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and David Tejtel of Friedman Oster & Tejtel. Courtesy photos
The question of whether Elon Musk was the “controlling shareholder” at Tesla while his record pay package was being hashed out was one of the central legal questions facing Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick.
After a five-day trial last year, McCormick this week gave a pretty emphatic answer in her 200-page opinion rescinding the $55.8 billion deal: Musk, at least as it came to this transaction, was in control.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
