A comprehensive survey of 52 cases where judges have considered whether to force parties to hand over their communications with litigation funders finds the “vast majority” deny such requisitions because of the work-product doctrine.
September 01, 2021 at 07:30 AM
5 minute read
Editor/columnist
So, your opponent in a case is working with a litigation funder. This means you’re going to get access to all kinds of interesting documents they’ve shared with their outside financial backer, right?
Prolly not.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Source: “Litigation Funding and Confidentiality: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Case Law” by By Charles M. Agee, III, Lucian T. Pera, and Alex Agee
