Pig farm.
The underlying case involves Arkansas' so-called “ag-gag” rule that would stymie undercover exposés of industrial agriculture--and it raises meaty First Amendment issues.
June 17, 2020 at 11:50 PM
1 minute read
Editor and columnist at The Litigation Daily
Move along, nothing to see here—just a simple case (yawn) about Article III standing.
Or at least that’s the message from lawyers for pig and chicken producers currently trying to fend off amicus briefs from top legal scholars and major media organizations. At issue: a so-called “ag-gag” rule that would stymie undercover exposés of industrial agriculture.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
