caption
The Sixth Circuit held that it would not have been improper for Kirkland client Henkel KGaA to have nixed the distribution deal "even if its sole motivation was to maximize its own profits.”
July 18, 2019 at 10:44 AM
1 minute read
Editor and columnist at The Litigation Daily
Kirkland litigators including newly-confirmed Ninth Circuit Judge Daniel Bress racked up second win on Tuesday, this one on behalf of client Henkel KGaA before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The billion-dollar claim against Kirkland’s client stemmed from failed negotiations over a potential distribution agreement.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
