X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The policy implications of whether taking a drug during pregnancy constitutes child abuse are vast and could implicate everything from the definition of a “child” to the pre-conception conduct of the mother. But, in resolving a dispute involving a mother who tested positive for opiates after giving birth, some members of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court seemed to indicate they would focus less on the broader policy implications and more on the specific language of the statute.

This premium content is locked for
Litigation Daily subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Lean Adviser Legal

Think Lean Daily Message

"Facts are what they are. You can t make them, manage them or control them. But what we can do is try to find them and figure out how to live with them. But future events are essentially fickle. The requirement is not investigation, it is risk assessment, and the techniques are quite different. And opinions are unlike either of the above. They are the view from inside someone s head, someone who matters. And sometimes you can change them."

Learn More

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.