Like every journalist, I’m grateful for laws that protect people exercising their First Amendment rights against dubious lawsuits designed to harass or intimidate.

But in practice, anti-SLAPP suits can be deeply unsatisfying, as two recent cases—one involving fitness guru Richard Simmons, the other a man on a self-proclaimed mission to stop revenge porn and cyber-bullying—make clear.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]