By Jacqueline Thomsen | June 2, 2020
"If the question is whether there's been an adequate search, what difference does it make what the intent was or reasons for using a private server, or Hillary Clinton's or anyone else's understanding of State's record searching obligations?" Judge Robert Wilkins asked.
Daily Business Review | Update
By Catherine Wilson | May 13, 2020
After a one-day experiment under its belt, the state's high court will go virtual again for three days of arguments in June.
By Josh Yount | April 13, 2020
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's decision toward the end of last year in Groves v. United States, 941 F.3d 315 (7th Cir. 2019), is quite unusual. It repudiates a long-standing Seventh Circuit precedent regarding the timeliness of interlocutory appeals sought under 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b).
By Tom McParland | March 23, 2020
One of the court's active judges had requested a poll on whether to rehear the case, but a vote fell short of the majority needed to put the matter before the full appeals court.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | March 20, 2020
Judge Thomas Griffith said he was locked out of arguments for five to six minutes after he got dropped from the phone conference.
By Scott D. Locke | March 6, 2020
'Energy Intelligence Group v. Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors' has significant ramifications for both copyright litigation strategies and how authors and copyright owners should name their digital files.
By Raychel Lean | March 4, 2020
A Coral Gables traffic ticket-fighting startup defended its business model before the Florida Supreme Court against allegations by the Florida Bar that it engages in the unlicensed practice of law.
By Ross Todd | February 21, 2020
In a ruling sure to be invoked in social media-heavy disputes that involve parties across state borders, a Michigan resident lost out on a bid to persuade the California Court of Appeal that he shouldn't face claims in the state's courts over fabricated direct messages and text conversations.
Daily Business Review | Commentary
By Charles M. Tatelbaum and Thomas B. Sternberg | February 20, 2020
The cases concerned unwanted and unsolicited telephone calls received by the plaintiffs in their respective cases. The ruling creates a new opportunity for massive litigation to be filed against those who telemarket.
By Jason Grant | February 18, 2020
The lawyers from Rosenberg Giger apparently never saw an oral argument date posting on the New York state Unified Court System's eCourts website and never received a notice.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS