In a hearing on Google’s bid to dismiss a proposed privacy class action over data gathered through the Chrome browser, the company’s counsel from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan sparred with plaintiffs attorneys over whether IP addresses are considered personally identifiable information under California’s most recent privacy provisions.
February 18, 2021 at 08:24 PM
1 minute read
Litigation editor
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge voiced concerns over Google’s definition of personally identifiable information as the company attempted to knock out a proposed privacy class action involving its Chrome browser.
In a virtual hearing Thursday, Google’s counsel from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and plaintiffs attorneys sparred over whether IP addresses are considered personally identifiable information under California’s most recent privacy provisions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California. Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
