By Scott Graham | July 27, 2017
An Irell team led by partners David Gindler and Jason Sheasby represented New York-based Regeneron Pharmaceuticals during district court proceedings that ended in a highly critical ruling and invalidation of a Regeneron patent.
By Scott Graham | July 26, 2017
The musicians want to prevent others from profiting off their kids' names. But to be successful, trademark applicants have to have a true intent to use the mark, says Knobbe Martens partner Ian Gillies.
By Rhys Dipshan | July 25, 2017
Designed by solution provider NIC, the new system will seek to automate the cumbersome and manual process of filing claims and tracking case progress.
By Scott Graham | July 25, 2017
Peace broke out last week between rivals Illumina Inc. and Qiagen N.V. as the companies settled a contentious suit in California. But before lawyers could pack up their files, a new patent war was taking shape in Delaware.
By Edward J. Bennett, Matthew H. Blumenstein and Xiao Wang | July 25, 2017
The Anthem settlement appears to represent yet another watershed moment in data breach litigation. This is a still a relatively new and rapidly evolving field, but, as more and more of these cases are filed, several recurring battle lines have emerged through parties' arguments and judicial opinions. This article discusses two such issues—standing and class certification. It also discusses the prospect of additional clarity in this area.
By Jennifer Williams-Alvarez | July 10, 2017
Though companies often place a high value on protecting their trademarks, some may be missing out on the opportunity to put others on notice of their rights by way of trademark symbols.
By Jennifer Williams-Alvarez | July 7, 2017
Don Rosenberg, general counsel of Qualcomm, spoke on why his company is striking back at Apple.
By Scott Graham | July 7, 2017
We asked Richard Gold of McGill University's Centre for Intellectual Property Policy to explain what last week's decision from the Supreme Court of Canada means for innovation, competition and patent quality.
By Erin S. Hennessy, Annie Allison and Salsabil Ahmed | July 6, 2017
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously held that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, the provision of federal trademark law barring registration of disparaging trademarks, violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause when applied to potentially disparaging or offensive trademarks.
By Scott Graham | July 5, 2017
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday ordered Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas to award attorney fees to Newegg, writing that deference to district court judges "is not absolute."
Presented by BigVoodoo
General Counsel Summit is the premier event for in-house counsel, hosting esteemed legal minds from all sectors of the economy.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS