To what extent can parties to a merger agreement contract around Delaware common-law protections against extracontractual fraud? Sparton v. O’Neil, C.A. No. 12403-VCMR (Aug. 9), a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision, reinforces a line of Delaware precedent holding that anti-reliance disclaimers in merger agreements can be used to defeat subsequent buyer claims for intentional fraud outside of the four corners of the contract, and that such claims can be defeated as early as the pleading stage.
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In Now
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org to learn more.