Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
193 results for '* topic:"Patent Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-10-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Denise S. Kraft, Brian A. Biggs, Erin E. Larson, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Michael G. Strapp, Larissa Bifano, Safraz Ishmael, DLA Piper LLP (US), Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Ronald F. Lopez, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer Hayes, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew A. Weber, Angelo Christopher, Nixon Peabody LLP, Chicago IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69159
Additional monetary sanctions and striking of equitable defenses ordered against defendant who submitted declaration known to the declarant to be materially false, when defendant failed to conduct a diligent investigation into the declaration and failed to promptly withdraw the declaration upon indications the declaration might have been false.
Publication Date: 2020-09-30
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James B. Monroe, Eric J. Fues, Laura P. Masurovsky, Paul W. Browning, Li Feng, Andrew E. Renison, Jeanette M. Roorda, and Aaron G. Clay, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips, Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D69134
Court applied ruling from sister district under doctrine of collateral estoppel where concurrent case in which plaintiff participated also litigated issue of patent invalidity for lack of written description.
Publication Date: 2020-09-30
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter J. McAndrews, Thomas J. Wimbiscus, James P. Murphy, Paul W. McAndrews, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Ashley M. Ratycz, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brett Schuman, Rachel M. Walsh, Goodwin Procter LLP, San Francisco, CA; Douglas J. Kline, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA; Andrew S. Ong, Goodwin Procter LLP, Redwood City, CA; Cindy Chang, Goodwin Procter LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case Number: D69140
The jury's verdict in this patent infringement matter was supported by sufficient evidence, so defendant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law or a new trial.
Publication Date: 2020-09-23
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; John S. Kyle, Kyle Harris LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefani E. Shanberg, Jennifer J. Schmidt, Madeleine E. Gully, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case Number: D69126
Patent claim was invalidated as abstract where it merely described computer functions performing routine operations to achieve an abstract goal without providing an actual functional mechanism that would constitute an inventive or improved process for performing those computer functions.
Publication Date: 2020-08-26
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jonathan A. Choa and Alan Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Binal J. Patel, Erik S. Murer, Brian T. Apel, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL; Joshua L. Davenport, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
for defendant: R. Touhey Myer, Gregory Grissett, Joseph Mathew, Offit Kurman, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Ted Semaya, Steven Thal, Alexander Mirkin, Offit Kurman, P.A., New York, NY; Michael Hogan, Offit Kurman, P.A., Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D69097
Plaintiff did not establish good cause with respect to its motion to amend the complaint after the pleadings had closed, so the court adopted the magistrate's order denying the motion to amend.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-08-26
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan Choa, Potter Anderson &Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah, Kristopher Kastens, Kramer Levin Naftalis& Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Jonathan S. Caplan, Marcus A. Colucci, Kramer Levin Naftalis& Frankel LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Ronald P. Golden III, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; David M. Hoffman, Fish & Richardson P.C., Austin, TX; Jeffrey Shneidman, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA for defendant.
Case Number: D69094
Motion to transfer venue in patent infringement case denied where none of the transfer factors favored transfer against the substantial weight afforded to plaintiff's choice of forum.
Publication Date: 2020-08-12
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan E. Morrison, Kelly Allenspach Del Dotto, Casey Kraning, and John S. Goetz, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Pilar G. Kraman and Robert M. Vrana, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Douglas J. Nash and John D. Cook, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY; Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; James H. Shalek and Baldassare Vinti, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69079
Court rejected parties' proposed claim construction where there was no evidence of inventor's disavowal of plaintiff's proposed construction, but where plaintiff's proposal provided no clarity to the claim, the court relied upon the textbook definition for plaintiff's proposed construction term as would be understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Publication Date: 2020-08-12
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter J. McAndrews, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar and Ashley M. Ratycz, McAndrews, Held & Mallory, Ltd., Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kenneth L. Dorsney, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul M. Sykes, David W. Holt, Benn C. Wilson and Jake M. Gipson, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL for defendant.
Case Number: D69086
Genuine issues of material fact existed with regard to this patent infringement matter, so the court denied the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2020-08-05
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Flynn and Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven N. Feldman, Christina V. Rayburn, Karen Younkins, Kevin X. Wang and Maxwell K. Coll, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Douglas R. Weider and James L. Ryerson, Greenberg Traurig, Wilmington, DE and Florham Park, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69058
Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate that its patents involved an inventive concept, rather than an abstract idea.
Publication Date: 2020-07-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Flynn and Anthony D. Raucci, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven N. Feldman, Christina V. Rayburn, Karen Younkins, Kevin X. Wang and Maxwell K. Coll, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Douglas R. Weider and James L. Ryerson, Greenberg Traurig, Wilmington, DE and Florham Park, NJ for defendant.
Case Number: D69058
Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to demonstrate that its patents involved an inventive concept, rather than an abstract idea.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read