Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
63 results for '* judge:"District Judge Stark"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-06-30
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry: Federal Government | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Allon Kedem, Jeffrey L. Handwerker, Sally L. Pei, Stephen K. Wirth, Arnold & Porter Kay Scholer LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
for defendant: Brian D. Netter, Michelle R. Bennett, Rachael L. Westmoreland, Kate Talmor, Jody Lowenstein, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: D69446
U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's guidance regarding the 340B drug program violated the Administrative Procedure Act due to lack of notice-and-comment where guidance materially altered obligations of drugmakers under the 340B program and constituted a final agency decision.
Publication Date: 2021-04-14
Practice Area: Copyrights
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Dale M. Cendali, Joshua L. Simmons, Eric A. Loverro, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
for defendant: David E. Moore, Stephanie E. O’Byrne, Tracey E. Timlin, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gabriel M. Ramsey, Kayvan M. Ghaffari, Crowell & Moring LLP, San Francisco, CA; Mark A. Klapow, Joshua M. Rychlinski, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case Number: D69365
The court denied defendant's motions to dismiss, because plaintiff adequately stated its claims for copyright infringement and tortious interference with a contractual relationship.
Publication Date: 2021-03-31
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Marc S. Casarino, Karine Sarkisian, White and Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Barbara Barto, Wilmington DE, pro se defendant; Bernard A. Van Ogtrop, Jared Thomas Green, James S. Green, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant Craig.
Case Number: D69343
Counterclaims for breach of annuity contract and bad faith not dismissed where insurer delayed payment to sole named beneficiary based on insurer's receipt of competing claim to benefits that was allegedly devoid of supporting evidence.
Publication Date: 2021-03-24
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Daniel S. Sommers, Joshua Handelsman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC; Richard A. Speirs, Amy Miller, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY; Kip B. Shuman, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, San Francisco, CA; Rusty E. Glenn, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, Denver, CO; Brett D. Stecker, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, Ardmore, PA; Ronald A. King, Clark Hill PLC, Lansing, MI for plaintiff.
for defendant: Gregory P. Williams, Raymond J. DiCamillo, Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Walter C. Carlson, Nilofer Umar, Caroline A. Wong, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case Number: D69335
Derivative claim of breach of loyalty dismissed where demand was not excused as plaintiff failed to show that directors were likely to face liability on underlying claim and therefore could not be disinterested and independent.
Publication Date: 2020-12-30
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Morton, Robert J. Valihura, Jr., David C. Zerbato, Morton, Valihura & Zerbato, LLC, Greenville, DE; Christopher DiPompeo, Kaytlin L. Roholt, Jones Day, Washington, DC; Roger Byron, First Liberty Institute, Plano, TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Max B. Walton, Lisa R. Hatfield, Brandon R. Harper, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Newark, DE; Daniel A. Griffith, Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLC, Wilmington, Delaware for defendants.
Case Number: D69240
Preliminary injunction on city policy banning private displays on public property denied where city revised the policy to address plaintiff's concerns and plaintiff did not challenge the revised policy.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-11-18
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Emily A. Letcher, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Sledge IV, Dylan C. Black, Zachary A. Madonia, Emily M. Ruzic, Stanley E. Blackmon, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Bir-mingham, AL for plaintiff.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jerome E. Speegle, Anthony M. Hoffman, Speegle, Hoffman, Holman & Holifield, LLC, Mobile, AL; Blake Rohrbacher, Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edmund Polubinski III, Brian M. Burnovski, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case Number: D69196
The court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's federal securities and state law claims.
Publication Date: 2020-11-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lexie G. White, Hunter Vance, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Andreas C. Healy, Jenna G. Farleigh, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John V. Gorman, Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Robert C. Bertin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Yar R. Chaikovsky, Bruce Yen, Alexander H. Lee, Radhesh Devendran, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Taylor Ludlam, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC: Steven D. Moore; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Russel A. Korn, Richard W. Goldstucker, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
Case Number: D69174
Defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent infringement claims denied where evidence could allow jury to find that patents-in-suit were directed to patentable subject matter and that the accused products infringed upon the patent claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Publication Date: 2020-10-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Denise S. Kraft, Brian A. Biggs, Erin E. Larson, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Michael G. Strapp, Larissa Bifano, Safraz Ishmael, DLA Piper LLP (US), Boston, MA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Ronald F. Lopez, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer Hayes, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew A. Weber, Angelo Christopher, Nixon Peabody LLP, Chicago IL for defendant.
Case Number: D69159
Additional monetary sanctions and striking of equitable defenses ordered against defendant who submitted declaration known to the declarant to be materially false, when defendant failed to conduct a diligent investigation into the declaration and failed to promptly withdraw the declaration upon indications the declaration might have been false.
Publication Date: 2020-08-05
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Electronics | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller and David M. Fry, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; David J. Miclean and Limin Zheng, Miclean Gleason LLP, San Mateo, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Micha Danzig and Paul M. Huston, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo P.C., San Diego, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D69059
Plaintiff failed to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, but the complaint adequately alleged claims for interference with contractual relations and with prospective economic advantage.
Publication Date: 2020-07-22
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Electronics | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller and David M. Fry, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; David J. Miclean and Limin Zheng, Miclean Gleason LLP, San Mateo, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Micha Danzig and Paul M. Huston, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo P.C., San Diego, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D69059
Plaintiff failed to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, but the complaint adequately alleged claims for interference with contractual relations and with prospective economic advantage.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read