Filter This View

  • Freed v. St. Jude Med., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-10-30
    Practice Area: Products Liability
    Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Culley, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Brian M. Rostocki and Benjamin P. Chapple, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. David Bickham, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA; Lisa M. Baird, Reed Smith LLP, Miami, FL; and Michael K. Brown, Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: D68751

    Products liability claims not dismissed where defendants failed to raise arguments in favor of dismissal in defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' prior version of their complaint containing similar or identical claims.

  • S.I.SV.EL. Societa Italiana Per Lo Sviluppo Dell' Elettronica S.P.A. v. Rhapsody Int'l Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-06-19
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defend-ants Rhapsody Int'l and Spotify USA Inc. Patrick Bageant, Hollystone Law, Boise, ID for defendant Rhapsody Int'l. Stefani E. Shanberg and Michael J. Guo, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant Spotify USA Inc.
    Case Number: D68605

    Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the patent involved an inventive concept.

  • Talley v. Christiana Care Health Sys.

    Publication Date: 2018-10-31
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michele D. Allen and Catilyn E. Quinn, Law Offices of Michele D. Allen LLC, Hockessin DE, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Joanna J. Cline and James H.S. Levine, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington, DE; Barbara T. Sicalides, Barak A. Bassman and Megan Morley, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68339

    Plaintiff alleged sufficient facts to support her breach of contract claim and some of her tort claims following the termination of her privileges from a health care organization.

  • Genedics, LLC v. Meta Co.

    Publication Date: 2018-09-05
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David W. deBruin, The deBruin Firm, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Leslie L. Jacobs, Jr. and Gabriela I. Coman, Rubin and Rudman LLP, Washington, DC, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura, and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Craig Kaufman, Michael C. Ting, and Fatima Alloo, Techknowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, attorneys for defendant.
    Case Number: D68271

    Motion to dismiss patent infringement complaint on grounds of non-patent-eligible subject matter denied where patent claims asserted sufficiently inventive concept overcoming obstacles of systems and processes by using existing components in more than conventional manner.

  • Goddard Sys., Inc. v. Gondal

    Publication Date: 2018-05-02
    Practice Area: Contracts | Trademarks
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann and Jeremy D. Anderson, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Dean T. Fournaris, John M. Doroghazi, and Jacob A. Sand, Wiggin and Dana LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Newark, DE; Christopher P. Coval, Fenningham, Dempster & Coval, LLP, Trevose, PA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68119

    Preliminary injunction denied where plaintiff had not proven defendants likely breach of non-compete covenants would continue or could not be fully remedied through monetary damages.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Goddard Sys., Inc. v. Gondal

    Publication Date: 2018-04-25
    Practice Area: Contracts | Trademarks
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Burke
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Douglas E. McCann and Jeremy D. Anderson, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Dean T. Fournaris, John M. Doroghazi, and Jacob A. Sand, Wiggin and Dana LLP, Philadelphia, PA, attorneys for plaintiff
    for defendant: Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Newark, DE; Christopher P. Coval, Fenningham, Dempster & Coval, LLP, Trevose, PA, attorneys for defendants.
    Case Number: D68119

    Preliminary injunction denied where plaintiff had not proven defendants likely breach of non-compete covenants would continue or could not be fully remedied through monetary damages.