0 results for 'null'
How to Take Ownership of Your Company's IP
For most companies, IP is their most valuable asset. When IP is created, the employee or consultant who created it freely (usually) assigns it to their employer or client. But sometimes, something goes wrong. Relationships can sour. The employee or consultant can leave. Or, the person might even pass away. If any of these things happen when there is no written assignment of the IP to the company, things can get messy.$400 a Day: Frivolous Litigation Leads to Sanction, About $10K Attorney Fees
"Failure to remit the funds fully, completely and timely will result in the imposition of a sanction in the amount of $400 per day for each day full payment remains due, owing and unpaid," read Atlanta Judicial Circuit Judge Melynee Leftridge's order.People in the News—May 21, 2024—Capehart Scatchard, Fox Rothschild
Capehart Scatchard shareholder Ralph R. Smith III recently attended Durand Inc.'s P.R.O.M. (People Rallying Our Mission) Night.DSBA to Hold Name Change Petition and Motion Filing CLE
The LGBTQ+ Section of the Delaware State Bar Association (DSBA) and Delaware Volunteer Legal Services are scheduled to hold a CLE titled, "Primer on Petitioning for a Name Change & Filing Motions to Proceed Under Seal in the Delaware Court of Common Pleas" from noon to 1 p.m. on Thursday.View more book results for the query "*"
Sheppard Mullin Continues Chicago Expansion With Mayer Brown Partner
Mayer Brown partner Tom Panoff, who does commercial and antitrust litigation, said the move to Sheppard Mullin is good for his practice and clients.Summer Associate 101: Focus on Knowledge of Self, Setting
You want to know how to make the most of your summer program. I endeavor to answer that question by focusing on two domains: knowledge of self, and knowledge of settingNew Rule Limits Judges' Remote Appearances in Civil Cases
The rule, adopted by the Judicial Council, was mandated by the California Legislature.Second Circuit Decision Spotlights RLUIPA's Reach, 'De Facto' Finality
The Second Circuit's decision puts municipalities on notice that attempts to delay a zoning decision may work against them when there are religious discrimination claims at stake.