• Micro Focus (US), Inc. v. Ins. Serv. Office, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-22
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Insurance | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Clayton Athey, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Hugh J. Marbury, Ryan P. Bottegal, Cozen O’Connor, Washington, DC; Stuart M.G. Seraina, Baldwin Seraina, Baltimore, MD for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Brian Lemon, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott S. Christie, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ for defendant.

    Case Number: D69545

    Significant factual disputes precluded summary judgment in this case involving end user licensing agreements for plaintiffs' software products.

  • Pharmacy Corp. of Am./Askari Consol. Litig.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-22
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Cianciulli, Weir & Partners, Wilmington, DE; Walter Weir, Jr., Steven E. Angstreich, Amy R. Brandt, Andrew Park, Weir & Partners, Philadelphia, PA; James Sawyer, Law Office of James Sawyer for Kaveh Askari and Onco360 Holdings parties.
    for defendant: Brett D. Fallon, Faergre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher G. Kelly, Stosh M. Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight, LLC, Boston, MA for Pharmacy Corp. of Am.

    Case Number: D69546

    Plaintiffs did not identify any manifest error in the court's rulings or with respect to the final judgment, so they were not en-titled to amendment of the final judgment or a new trial.

  • Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Transit U, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
    Industry: Insurance | Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ronald P. Schiller, Matthew N. Klebanoff, Daniel P. Kaufman, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David J. Soldo, Damon B. Ferarra, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel P. Bennett, Mintzer, Saro-witz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D69491

    Plaintiff was entitled to proceed with certain declaratory relief claims, but the court granted a motion to dismiss a claim that sought reformation of an insurance policy to which plaintiff was not a party.

  • In re: TK Holdings, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-07-28
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James F. DeBouno, pro se appellant, Voorhees, NJ;
    for defendant: Stanley B. Tarr, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; David J. Molton, Cameron Moxley, Gerard T. Cicero, Uchechi A. Egeonuigwe, Brown Rudnick LLP, New York, NY for trustee of Takata Airbag Tort Compensation Trust.

    Case Number: D69481

    The court affirmed a decision by the bankruptcy court which rejected certain claims because debtors did not manufacture the sensor that was responsible for claimants' injuries.

  • HostForWeb, Inc. v. Frank

    Publication Date: 2021-07-21
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: E-Commerce | Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Taylor, Jr., Charles E. Davis, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, Wilmington, DE; John B. Wolf, Ashman & Stein, Stokie, IL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John A. Sensing, Jesse L. Noa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Branden P. Moore, McGuire Woods LLP, Pittsburgh, PA for defendants.

    Case Number: D69472

    Defendants' counterclaims were dismissed where it could not obtain a setoff from its payments to plaintiff for plaintiff's purported breach of the parties' asset purchase agreement where the express terms of the APA did not allow for setoffs.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Legal Malpractice & Lawyer Discipline 2023

    Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re: Boy Scouts of Am.

    Publication Date: 2021-04-14
    Practice Area: Bankruptcy
    Industry: Insurance | Non-Profit
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jonathan Hacker, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC; Tancred Schiavoni, Janine Panchok-Berry, An-drew Kirschenbaum, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY; Stamatios Stamoulis, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Jessica C.K. Boelter, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY; Thomas A. Labuda, Michael C. Andolina, Matthew E. Linder, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; Derek C. Abbott, Andrew R. Remming, Eric W. Moats, Morris Nich-ols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellees.

    Case Number: D69363

    The bankruptcy court did not err in setting a bar date and establishing a claim form for sexual abuse claim-ants.

  • Hemostemix, Inc. v. Accudata Solutions, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-04-14
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Biotechnology
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew Denn, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher Oprison, Ardith Bronson, DLA Piper LLP, Mi-ami, FL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: R. Karl Hill, Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Jason J. Curliano, Christopher Ohlsen, Buty & Curliano, Oakland, CA; Kelly E. Farnan, Blake Rohrbacher, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Daniel Buchholz, Holland & Knight LLP, Tampa, FL for defendants.

    Case Number: D69362

    The court denied defendant's motion for a stay.

  • Duross v. Connections Cmty. Support Programs, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-04-07
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald G. Poliquin, The Poliquin Firm, LLC, Dover, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Dana Spring Monzo, Kelly E. Rowe, White and Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D69350

    Inmate adequately pled §1983 claim for failure to render treatment by alleging defendants withheld medication that suppressed symptoms of inmate's ulcerative colitis and then subsequently denied treatment for flare-ups of symptoms.

  • Estate of Albart v. Lavastone Capital LLC

    Publication Date: 2021-03-31
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald L. Gouge, Jr., Donald L. Gouge, Jr., LLC, Wilmington, DE; Daniel R. Miller, Walden Macht & Haran LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Kenneth J. Nachbar, Megan Ward Cascio, Zi-Xiang Shen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D69344

    Court declined to dismiss or stay action under Colorado River abstention doctrine where moving party failed to explain how the case met any of the six factors under the doctrine to warrant favoring a parallel action in another jurisdiction.

  • Perma-Liner Indus., LLC v. D'Hulster

    Publication Date: 2021-03-31
    Practice Area: Commercial Law
    Industry: Construction
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Holt, Alberto E. Chavez, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Scott G. Wilcox, Moore and Rutt, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert D. Eckard, Law Office of Robert Eckard & Associates, P.A., Palm Harbor, FL for defendant.

    Case Number: D69347

    Public policy factors warranted the transfer of this case to a federal district court in another state, even though two of the parties' agreements contained mandatory forum selection clauses in favor of Delaware.